Anticybersquatting
Consumer Protection Act (as Introduced in the Senate)
S 1255 IS
106th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 1255
To protect consumers
and promote electronic commerce by amending certain trademark
infringement, dilution, and counterfeiting laws, and for other
purposes.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED
STATES
June 21, 1999
Mr. ABRAHAM (for himself, Mr.
TORRICELLI, Mr. HATCH, and Mr. MCCAIN) introduced the following
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the
Judiciary
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A BILL
To protect consumers
and promote electronic commerce by amending certain trademark
infringement, dilution, and counterfeiting laws, and for other
purposes.
Be it enacted by the
Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America
in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT
TITLE.
This Act may be cited
as the `Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act'.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds that
the unauthorized registration or use of trademarks as Internet
domain names or other identifiers of online locations (commonly
known as `cybersquatting')--
(1) results in
consumer fraud and public confusion as to the true source or
sponsorship of products and services;
(2) impairs
electronic commerce, which is important to the economy of the United
States; and
(3) deprives owners
of trademarks of substantial revenues and consumer goodwill.
SEC. 3. TRADEMARK
REMEDIES.
(a) RECOVERY FOR
VIOLATION OF RIGHTS- Section 35 of the Act entitled `An Act to
provide for the registration and protection of trade-marks used in
commerce, to carry out the provisions of certain international
conventions, and for other purposes', approved July 5, 1946,
(commonly referred to as the `Trademark Act of 1946') (15 U.S.C.
1117) is amended by adding at the end the following:
`(d)(1) In this
subsection, the term `Internet' has the meaning given that term in
section 230(f)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C.
230(f)(1)).
`(2)(A) In a case
involving the registration or use of an identifier described in
subparagraph (B), the plaintiff may elect, at any time before final
judgment is rendered by the trial court, to recover, instead of
actual damages and profits under subsection (a)--
`(i) an award of
statutory damages in the amount of--
`(I) not less than
$1,000 or more than $100,000 per trademark per identifier, as the
court considers just; or
`(II) if the court
finds that the registration or use of the registered trademark as an
identifier was willful, not less than $3,000 or more than $300,000
per trademark per identifier, as the court considers just; and
`(ii) full costs and
reasonable attorney's fees.
`(B) An identifier
referred to in subparagraph (A) is an Internet domain name or other
identifier of an online location that is--
`(i) the trademark of
a person or entity other than the person or entity registering or
using the identifier; or
`(ii) sufficiently
similar to a trademark of a person or entity other than the person
or entity registering or using the identifier as to be likely to--
`(I) cause confusion
or mistake;
`(II) deceive; or
`(III) cause dilution
of the distinctive quality of a famous trademark.'.
(b) REMEDIES FOR
DILUTION OF FAMOUS MARKS- Section 43(c)(2) of the Act entitled `An
Act to provide for the registration and protection of trade-marks
used in commerce, to carry out the provisions of certain
international conventions, and for other purposes', approved July 5,
1946, (commonly referred to as the `Trademark Act of 1946') (15
U.S.C. 1125(c)(2)) is amended by striking `35(a)' and inserting `35
(a) and (d)'.
SEC. 4. CRIMINAL
USE OF COUNTERFEIT TRADEMARK.
(a) IN GENERAL-
Section 2320(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by inserting
`(1)' after `(a)';
(2) by striking
`section that occurs' and inserting `paragraph that occurs'; and
(3) by adding at the
end the following:
`(2)(A) In this
paragraph, the term `Internet' has the meaning given that term in
section 230(f)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C.
230(f)(1)).
`(B)(i) Except as
provided in clause (ii), whoever knowingly and fraudulently or in
bad faith registers or uses an identifier described in subparagraph
(C) shall be guilty of a Class B misdemeanor.
`(ii) In the case of
an offense by a person under this paragraph that occurs after that
person is convicted of another offense under this section, that
person shall be guilty of a Class E felony.
`(C) An identifier
referred to in subparagraph (B) is an Internet domain name or other
identifier of an online location that is--
`(i) the trademark of
a person or entity other than the person or entity registering or
using the identifier; or
`(ii) sufficiently
similar to a trademark of a person or entity other than the person
or entity registering or using the identifier as to be likely to--
`(I) cause confusion
or mistake;
`(II) deceive; or
`(III) cause dilution
of the distinctive quality of a famous trademark.
`(D)(i) For the
purposes of a prosecution under this paragraph, if all of the
conditions described in clause (ii) apply to the registration or use
of an identifier described in subparagraph (C) by a defendant, those
conditions shall constitute prima facie evidence that the
registration or use was fraudulent or in bad faith.
`(ii) The conditions
referred to in clause (i) are as follows:
`(I) The defendant
registered or used an identifier described in subparagraph (C)--
`(aa) with intent to
cause confusion or mistake, deceive, or cause dilution of the
distinctive quality of a famous trademark; or
`(bb) with the
intention of diverting consumers from the domain or other online
location of the person or entity who is the owner of a trademark
described in subparagraph (C) to the domain or other online location
of the defendant.
`(II) The defendant--
`(aa) provided false
information in the defendant's application to register the
identifier; or
`(bb) offered to
transfer the registration of the identifier to the trademark owner
or another person or entity in consideration for any thing of value.
`(III) The identifier
is not--
`(aa) the defendant's
legal first name or surname; or
`(bb) a trademark of
the defendant used in legitimate commerce before the earlier of the
first use of the registered trademark referred to in subparagraph
(C) or the effective date of the registration of that trademark.
`(iii) The
application of this subparagraph shall not be exclusive. Nothing in
this subparagraph may be construed to limit the applicability of
subparagraph (B).'.
(b) SENTENCING
GUIDELINES-
(1) IN GENERAL-
Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Sentencing
Commission under section 994(p) of title 28, United States Code, the
United States Sentencing Commission shall--
(A) review the
Federal sentencing guidelines for crimes against intellectual
property (including offenses under section 2320 of title 18, United
States Code); and
(B) promulgate such
amendments to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines as are necessary to
ensure that the applicable sentence for a defendant convicted of a
crime against intellectual property is sufficiently stringent to
deter such a crime.
(2) FACTORS FOR
CONSIDERATION- In carrying out this subsection, the United States
Sentencing Commission shall--
(A) take into account
the findings under section 2; and
(B) ensure that the
amendments promulgated under paragraph (1)(B) adequately provide for
sentencing for crimes described in paragraph (2) of section 2320(a)
of title 18, United States Code, as added by subsection (a).
SEC. 5. LIMITATION
OF LIABILITY.
Section 39 of the Act
entitled `An Act to provide for the registration and protection of
trade-marks used in commerce, to carry out the provisions of certain
international conventions, and for other purposes', approved July 5,
1946, (commonly referred to as the `Trademark Act of 1946') (15
U.S.C. 1121) is amended by adding at the end the following:
`(c)(1) In this
subsection, the term `Internet' has the meaning given that term in
section 230(f)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C.
230(f)(1)).
`(2)(A) An Internet
service provider, domain name registrar, or registry described in
subparagraph (B) shall not be liable for monetary relief to any
person for a removal or transfer described in that subparagraph,
without regard to whether the domain name or other identifier is
ultimately determined to be infringing or dilutive.
`(B) An Internet
service provider, domain name registrar, or registry referred to in
subparagraph (A) is a provider, registrar, or registry that, upon
receipt of a written notice from the owner of a trademark registered
in the Patent and Trademark Office, removes from domain name service
(DNS) service or registration, or transfers to the trademark owner,
an Internet domain name or other identifier of an online location
alleged to be infringing or dilutive, in compliance with--
`(i) a court order;
or
`(ii) the reasonable
implementation of a policy prohibiting the unauthorized registration
or use of another's registered trademark as an Internet domain name
or other identifier of an online location.'.